The software once again tidied up this mess, thoroughly but also much slower. Windows had dispersed large film files onto all corners of the volume. The software had absolutely no problem here, and after just 45 minutes had tidied up 45 Gigabytes of data. One of them was relatively tidy, meaning O&O Defrag only had to re-sort small files. Speed: COMPUTERBILD used two totally different fragmented hard disks during testing. Does “Defrag 10 Professional” bring speed and life back to a PC? COMPUTERBILD put it to the test: When the file is requested, all the individual pieces must first be packed back together on the hard disk. The parts of a file are dispersed over the hard disk. That is because Windows doesn’t always save files in one piece but fragmented. Saving files to the hard disk belongs to the most important tasks a computer carries out but at the same time slows a computer down over time. Here is the translation of a review in ComputerBild magazine
RitaSkeeter 06:33, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Reply The sources have not been listed because they could not be verified yet. Not all of the extensive reviews are available online, but appeared in print. Some (but not all) of these articles are listed. Ummel ( talk) 23:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC) Reply īefore you mark this article for deletion, please note that O&O Defrag is often reviewed along with other notable defrag software in reputable, independent PC magazines. Maybe you're the phony, because I work in the healthcare industry. You just talk about how "it is so obvious" with no proof. I said to list specifics or fix them and you have failed to do so. Regardless, what is wrong with this article? How can someone write an article about a program without listing its features? There is a 'known issues' section, so I do not see what the hassle is about. Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.86.50.247 ( talk) 02:08, (UTC) Reply I'm experienced enough to know to log in before commenting, and how to sign my posts. I will make sure this nonsense stops, since you are either a confederate or terribly naive. If a mod would like to re-tag it, please list some specific items you don't agree with.- Ummel ( talk) 22:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Reply This article is a blatant advertisement maintained by the software publisher. I'm removing this advert tag because it placed by an IP, not a registered user, and The article doesn't seem like an advertisement, especially with the Known Issues section.
0 kommentar(er)
